Skip to content
Soriaga & Associates, LLC logo

OASIS-E2 and PDGM Case-Mix Accuracy: Protecting Home Health Revenue in 2026

Christian Soriaga, CPA6 min read

On this page

Key Takeaways

  • OASIS-E2 took effect April 1, 2026 and is required for all assessments with a target date on or after that day (OMB control number 0938-1279, expiring 12/31/2028).
  • The legacy iQIES data-entry front end was discontinued April 1, 2026. Assessments dated 1/1/2025-3/31/2026 are accepted only through December 31, 2026.
  • 432 case-mix groups come from 2 admission sources x 2 timing categories x 12 clinical groups x 3 functional impairment levels x 3 comorbidity levels.
  • CY 2026 recalibrated all 432 weights, functional levels, comorbidity subgroups, and LUPA thresholds using CY 2024 claims as of July 11, 2025; 18 groups saw their LUPA threshold drop by one visit.
  • The CY 2026 national standardized 30-day payment amount is $2,038.22, or $1,998.41 for agencies that fail quality reporting — a 2-percentage-point APU penalty.
  • CY 2026's aggregate impact was -1.3%, or -$220 million: a +2.4% update against a -1.023% permanent and -3.0% temporary behavior adjustment.
  • The CY 2027 proposed rule (CMS-1844-P) proposes no new permanent adjustment, keeps the -3.0% temporary adjustment, and estimates a +2.4% net aggregate impact (+$420 million). It drew 657 comments and is not final.
  • OASIS data must reach CMS within 30 days of the assessment date to count as timely for the HH QRP.

What OASIS-E2 Changed, and What It Broke

OASIS-E2 is a targeted revision rather than a rewrite. The items it touches sit close to scoring and submission edits, which is why a modest instrument change carries financial weight.

The instrument

Item Detail Source
Effective date Assessments with a target date on or after 4/1/2026 CMS OASIS Data Sets
Prior version OASIS-E1, effective 1/1/2025 CMS OASIS Data Sets
OMB control number 0938-1279, expires 12/31/2028 CMS OASIS Data Sets
Submission system iQIES, file upload only CMS / QTSO

The submission change most agencies underestimated

CMS discontinued the legacy iQIES front-end interface — the screen QA staff used to key assessments in by hand — effective April 1, 2026. Assessments with target dates on or after that day cannot be hand-entered at all; data must be uploaded in the correct file format. Assessments dated 1/1/2025 through 3/31/2026 will be accepted until 12/31/2026, and then that door closes too.

If your agency used manual entry as a backstop when the EMR export failed, the backstop is gone. A file-format error is now a submission failure, and a submission failure is an APU risk worth two percentage points on every 30-day period for a full year.

How 432 Groups Actually Get Built

PDGM assigns each 30-day period to one of 432 home health resource groups. CMS states the arithmetic plainly: 2 x 2 x 12 x 3 x 3 = 432.

The five variables

Variable Levels Set by OASIS-dependent?
Admission source 2 — community or institutional Claims history No
Timing 2 — early or late Claims history No
Clinical grouping 12 Primary diagnosis coding Indirectly
Functional impairment level 3 — low, medium, high OASIS GG and M items Yes
Comorbidity adjustment 3 — none, low, high Secondary diagnosis coding Indirectly

The 12 clinical groups are musculoskeletal rehabilitation; neuro/stroke rehabilitation; wounds; behavioral health; complex nursing interventions; and seven MMTA subgroups covering surgical aftercare, cardiac and circulatory, endocrine, gastrointestinal and genitourinary, infectious disease/neoplasms/blood-forming diseases, respiratory, and other.

Functional impairment level is the one variable clinicians control at the bedside, and it is the one CMS keeps re-deriving. CMS sets the functional thresholds so that roughly one-third of periods in each clinical group falls into each of the three levels. That is a relative standard, not an absolute one. When CMS recalibrates against newer claims, an identical clinical picture can score into a different level than it did the year before — and revenue per period changes without anyone at your agency doing anything differently.

The comorbidity structure

For CY 2026, CMS finalized 20 low-comorbidity subgroups and 98 high-comorbidity interaction subgroups. A period receives the low adjustment or the high adjustment, never both. A diagnosis qualifies for inclusion only if it appears in more than 0.1% of 30-day periods with at least median resource use — which is why a comorbidity your clinicians consider obvious may carry no payment weight at all, and why coding to the list beats coding to intuition.

The LUPA Trap

Every one of the 432 groups carries its own LUPA threshold, set at the 10th percentile of visits in that group or two visits, whichever is higher. CMS updates those thresholds annually.

Rule year LUPA threshold movement Status Source
CY 2026 18 case-mix groups declined by one visit Final CY 2026 HH PPS final rule
CY 2027 18 groups decline by one visit; 2 groups increase by one visit Proposed CMS-1844-P

A period that cleared threshold by a single visit in CY 2025 can fall under it in CY 2026 for the identical patient. LUPA converts a full 30-day period payment into a per-visit payment — the largest single per-episode revenue event in home health, and the most preventable one, because it is a scheduling problem rather than a clinical one.

CY 2025-forward LUPA add-on factors

Discipline Add-on factor
Skilled nursing 1.7200
Physical therapy 1.6225
Speech-language pathology 1.6696
Occupational therapy 1.7238

Unchanged in CY 2026 and in the CY 2027 proposal.

Where accuracy turns into dollars

Risk Financial consequence
Functional score understated Lower case-mix weight, lower payment for identical care
Functional score overstated Audit and overpayment exposure
Visit count below the group's LUPA threshold Full period payment replaced by per-visit payment
Qualifying comorbidity not coded Missed low or high comorbidity adjustment
Assessment submitted late or in a bad format HH QRP non-compliance, 2-point APU reduction

The Rate Environment Around the Assessment

Case-mix accuracy matters more when the base rate is under pressure, and it is.

CY 2026, final

Metric Value Source
National standardized 30-day payment amount $2,038.22 CMS Transmittal 13488 (CR 14304)
Same, agencies not submitting quality data $1,998.41 CMS Transmittal 13488
Payment update +2.4% (3.2% market basket less 0.8 pt productivity) CY 2026 final rule
Permanent behavior adjustment -1.023% CY 2026 final rule
Temporary behavior adjustment -3.0% CY 2026 final rule
Aggregate impact vs. CY 2025 -1.3% (-$220 million) CY 2026 final rule
Fixed-dollar loss ratio 0.37 CY 2026 final rule

CY 2027, proposed — not final

Metric Value Status
Payment update +2.1% (+$370 million) Proposed
Net aggregate impact vs. CY 2026 +2.4% (+$420 million) Proposed
Additional permanent adjustment None proposed Proposed
Temporary behavior adjustment -3.0%, collecting about $500 million Proposed
Remaining temporary adjustment balance about $4.9 billion Proposed rule estimate
Recalibration data year CY 2025 claims as of March 15, 2026 Proposed
Fixed-dollar loss ratio 0.29 Proposed
Estimated 30-day periods, CY 2027 7,680,775 Proposed rule estimate
Comments received 657 Regulations.gov, docket CMS-2026-2311

The comment window closed August 31, 2026, and no final rule had issued as of September 18, 2026.

The margin context CMS itself publishes

Comparison Base rate Estimated 30-day cost Spread
CY 2024 $2,038.13 $1,548.39 about 32%
CY 2025 $2,057.35 $1,532.84 about 34%

CMS uses this spread to argue the rates are adequate. It is a national average against a national average cost, and it is the number every proposed cut rests on. An agency whose actual cost per period runs materially above $1,532.84 is not the agency in that table — and the only way to prove that in a comment letter, a rate appeal, or a bank conversation is a cost structure that ties cleanly to the Medicare cost report rather than to a management spreadsheet.

Building an Internal Accuracy Program

Case-mix accuracy is a documentation-control problem, not a coding problem. The fix is process, and it is auditable.

  • Reconcile the assessed functional level against the final claim on a monthly sample. Divergence means the OASIS and the claim are telling different stories.
  • Run a LUPA watch list against the actual CY 2026 thresholds for your top 20 payment groups by volume, not a single blended threshold.
  • Second-review every SOC and ROC for 60 days after any instrument change — April 2026 for E2, and again whenever the next version lands.
  • Track inter-clinician variance on GG items. Wide variance on the same patient type is the clearest signal of a training gap, and the cheapest one to close.
  • Validate file format before the deadline, not after a rejection notice. Manual entry is no longer available as a recovery path.
  • Clear the 12/31/2026 backlog. Any assessment dated 1/1/2025-3/31/2026 that is still unsubmitted has a hard expiration.

The Bottom Line

The instrument changed in April, the weights changed in January, and both change again if CY 2027 finalizes as proposed. Agencies that audit their own functional scoring and LUPA exposure quarterly keep the revenue their care actually earns. Agencies that do not find out from a MAC, two years late, in a letter. If you want a second set of eyes on where your case mix and your claims diverge, schedule a free consultation.

Sources

Last updated: September 2026.

Soriaga & Associates, LLC is a CPA firm with 25+ years of home health and hospice accounting experience. Ask about our bookkeeping services built for PDGM agencies.

Keep reading

Free 20-minute call

Let's look at your home health numbers together.

Talk directly with Christian Soriaga, CPA. No pitch deck, no obligation.

On the call we’ll cover

  • Your situation and what is due next
  • Deadlines and filing status
  • A clear written fee quote
  • Clear next steps, no obligation

Christian Soriaga, CPA

Soriaga & Associates, LLC

Book a Free Call